Sunday, 30 July 2017

SUNDAY RUNDOWN - THAT'S WHAT SHE READ

So I've survived the first week on my own without any major incidents or going insane. I have to admit I've got into something of an OAP type routine in the last few days when I had a run of early shifts. I started to eat around 5pm and head to bed about 9. It's so fucking rock and roll I can't function. Tonight was a little different though. I didn't eat until after 7pm. It was a massive shock to the system. Tonight my twin sister invited me round for dinner. I imagine this was mainly to make sure I hadn't starved whilst being alone. It was a lovely evening but my routine is a little off. Which is why I'm writing this now and watching the season 1 finale of The Handmaid's Tale. So I'm feeling a mixture of contentment, panicked and traumatised right now. But I'll get through. Well, not so much the trauma... this show is fucked up. I love it! Now, I'd best get to bed because it's now way past my new bedtime.

Thursday, 27 July 2017

TBT - Casa de mi Padre (2012)


On Tuesday I criticised Will Ferrell's new film The House for being short at 88 minutes long. Casa di mi Padre undercuts that by 3 minutes. So, if you thought I was harsh to the former then just wait until I get started on the latter. Until I watched it specifically for this review I'd never seen this film before. I used to pride myself on watching every film that Will Ferrell starred in but, over the years, I've really become quite lax in my viewing. I think it was probably around the Bewitched era when it just became a bit too much for me. I feel as though I'm on fairly safe ground with any kind of Will Ferrell/Adam McKay combination but the pair only act as one of the many producers for this film. Instead it is a combined effort of ex-SNL writer, Andrew Steele's, script and Funny or Die co-creator, Matt Piedmont, in the director's chair. I can't say that, after seeing the disappointing results of a union between Will Ferrell and Amy Poehler, I wasn't exactly excited to see this. Especially when it couldn't even find enough comedy to fill a 90 minute running time. Then again, maybe it's just so well-developed that anything over 85 minutes would be too much for the audience to handle? It's possible, right?

Tuesday, 25 July 2017

Tuesday's Reviews - The House (2017)


Will Ferrell is one of those comedians that you can trust to be funny whatever he's doing. Through the years, I've happily watched and enjoyed every film starring him that I've ever seen. Even the shit ones, like Daddy's Home for example, have something fairly entertaining in them. The guy always gives his all in a role and is so naturally hilarious that you'll find yourself crying with laughter at the stupidest things. So I kind of feel like I'm on solid ground with him and that's before you even consider that Amy Poehler is also in it. Combine the pair and you have a powerhouse of SNL alumni. Of course, things start to unravel when you look at how the film is being marketed. It's very telling that neither Ferrell or Poehler seem very eager to talk about the film itself. Interviews aren't treated as a place to talk about the film but simply about getting the pair in front of a camera. Will Ferrell has done some shit films in the past so when he's keeping shtum about a film then you know it's embarrassing. 1 hour and 28 minutes worth of embarrassing. Yep, The House can't even hit the 90 minute mark and we've all heard the one about good films
coming in short run times. Well, even if this is going to be shit at least it's not going to be shit for too long. Let's be thankful for small mercies.

Sunday, 23 July 2017

SUNDAY RUNDOWN - THAT'S WHAT SHE READ

For the next couple of weeks I have the whole house to myself. Now, I've seen Risky Business, I know what I'm meant to do with an empty house. It's safe to say I've been enjoying the freedom. You know, showering at normally unsociable hours, playing the Hamilton soundtrack at full blast, and not locking the bathroom door. I think it's safe to say I'm living life to the full right now. But, tearing myself away from the rock n roll lifestyle, I still have to stick to my schedule. So on with the rundown.

Thursday, 20 July 2017

TBT - Snowpiercer (2014)

I have a bit of a problem guys: I'm love a man who is completely unattainable. That man is Chris Evans. It hasn't always been this way. No no. Back in the Fantastic Four days I couldn't have cared less. Even the first Captain American film didn't do anything for me... I assume it's down to the creepy tiny Steve CGI. Yeah, I happily denied any attraction to Chris Evans for years and even presented arguments with my friend about why Robert Downey Jr. was a more attractive member of the Avengers. Then bloody Winter Solider went and got really good and suddenly Chris Evans starts to look better and better. By the time Civil War came out I was hooked. Seeing him do interviews with his Gifted co-star kind of made my ovaries explode. I don't know what's happening to me. It was because of my deep-seated interest in Chris Evans that I was so desperate to see Snowpiercer. I knew very little about it but had heard great things. Unfortunately, that proved difficult because the bloody thing wasn't released in UK cinemas. Then I managed to miss it on Netflix because I'm a bloody idiot. I became invigorated after seeing Okja earlier this week so went on a hunt to find a copy of Snowpiercer.

Tuesday, 18 July 2017

Tuesday's Reviews - Okja (2017)

Since Netflix started making original films there have been more than a few duds. The online streaming site is really good at certain things, like Marvel TV series, documentaries and original sitcoms for example. However, the majority of the original films that I've watched have been underwhelming: The Circle was just dreadful; Mascots was fun but nothing to really get excited about; The Fundamentals of Caring was sweet but unambitious; and Special Correspondents was the worst Ricky Gervais film I've ever see and that's saying something. So it was really refreshing that one of its recent releases, Bong Joon-ho's Okja, was competing for the Palme d'Or at this years Cannes festival. Refreshing for about 30 seconds obviously because, as we all know, the shit really hit the fan soon after. The argument against Okja's inclusion in the list of Palme d'Or candidates created much controversy for the judging panel who suggested that the film's release on Netflix meant it shouldn't have been allowed within the competition. When the film was opened to the press it received boos from the audience and suffered from technical issues. Still, this did nothing for the film's reputation and, in its official opening, the film got an standing ovation from the audience. Everything was looking good for Okja being a rare Netflix hit.

Monday, 17 July 2017

Quick Post: Women can be Doctors too

So I've just finished the first episode of Season 7 of Game of Thrones and I have so many thoughts buzzing through my brain. Which is why I'm not trying to get an early night ahead of my 7 am start tomorrow morning. Instead I wanted to write a quick post in response to yesterday's announcement about the new Doctor Who as there has been so much controversy. Naturally, people have a lot of feelings on the matter... but that's hardly new. Every regeneration has had some amount of hatred. Even the amazing Peter Capaldi still has his doubters as I discovered today when a female coworker proudly proclaimed that she hated him. I really had to bite my tongue at that moment. Capaldi has suffered because of terrible writing but has done wonders with the character. His version of the Doctor is one of the best we've had in years but his stories haven't served him well enough. I have nothing against Matt Smith or David Tennant but Capaldi tried to do something different with the character and I will defend him to anyone. I imagine that the people who dislike him are also the same stupid people that fail to accept that Donna was the best companion. I reckon they're all fans of David Tennant and Billie Piper and just can't move on. Speaking of moving on...

Sunday, 16 July 2017

SUNDAY RUNDOWN - THAT'S WHAT SHE READ

In all honesty, I had planned to be in bed by now but, thanks to one thing and another, I'm still typing this late into the night. Not only was A Handmaid's Tale on 30 minutes later than I expected but then I got caught up in finishing job applications. Probably the wrong time to be doing it but I'd mixed my dates up. Still, I'm here now and about to settle down for a bit of reading before I head to bed properly. Though I need to finish changing my sheets first. Today's lazy Sunday routine seems to have got a bit out of hand if I'm honest. I'm about halfway through finishing loads of things. It's been a rough couple of days at work so I really just wanted to relax today. I'll get stuff finished after work tomorrow. Sometimes procrastination can be justified... right?

Friday, 14 July 2017

FBF - Spider-Man 2 (2004)

Ever since the release of Spider-Man: Homecoming this month the internet has eagerly been taking every chance it can to rank the web-slinger's movies in order of brilliance. It's just what we do. We can't just appreciate things for their own merit. Oh, no. We have to make sure there is a definitive decision on which one you're allowed to like the most. (She says hoping nobody picks up on the hypocrisy of someone who ranks things every first Wednesday of the month.) Apparently, it's not possible to thing both the new film and the older films are all okay so we have to decide which is the best. I've seen so many lists in the last few days and things are getting crazy. After all, there aren't that many live action Spider-Man films. There are, really, only 6. Which I assume is the reason that many people are desperately including Civil War on their list so it doesn't seem so utterly pointless and pathetic. It's not a fucking Spider-Man film; stop going out of your way to put Andrew Garfield's film further down the list. So, before this goes into rant territory, the main topic of conversation that seems to exist now is whether the newest film is better than the film that previously topped the list: Toby Maguire's sequel. It is widely acknowledged that his third time to put on the suit was the biggest disaster to happen to comic book movies ever but is Spider-Man 2 actually still better than Tom Holland's first attempt? There's only one way to find out.

Thursday, 13 July 2017

TBT - Spider-Man (2002)

Before the release of Spider-Man: Homecoming came out it seemed as though everybody in the world had decided without a shadow of a doubt that this was going to be the best Spider-Man film since 2004. Suddenly, Toby Maguire was being hailed as some sort of hero because of his role as Peter Parker. I get that there were many disappointing things about The Amazing Spider-Man but the mistakes weren't down to Andrew Garfield. They were down to poor writing and Sony desperately trying to build a franchise to compete with Marvel Films. It was handled terribly but I've always been a fan of Garfield's Peter... even though he is a tad too old to play a high school student. Plus, how was everyone forgetting that Toby Maguire is kind of a terrible actor in these films? Those tears when Uncle Ben dies? That's been a pretty strong feature of the meme circuit for years now. I felt like I had fallen in an insane alternate reality where everybody else's memories of those films were different from mine. So, I decided to rewatch them for this week... just to be sure.

Wednesday, 12 July 2017

Tuesday's (ish) Reviews - Spider-Man: Homecoming (2017)

I've always felt that Andrew Garfield got a bit of a rough deal when it came to his time as Spider-Man. He is now widely considered the worst version of the character to appear on screen but it's hardly his fault. Now, I liked The Amazing Spider-Man and thought Garfield did a really good job with the character of Peter Parker. Yes, he wasn't the same geeky, isolated young man that we're used to but we're living in a world where geek is cool. Garfield gave Peter some sass and it could have worked really well for him because Spider-Man has always been the sassy one. The films didn't work because Garfield was bad but because he wasn't given the right material. Sony fucked up the reboot in order to get it out in time. I think the things would have been very different if the actor had been given more of a chance and there had been more thought in the whole thing. Plus, there's a lot of weird nostalgia surrounding Toby Magurire's time as the character that I don't really get. He's not that good. It's just that he was the first major big screen version of the character. It just boggles my mind that so much of the stuff I read before I saw Tom Holland's first solo outing as the web-slinger was focused on how great Maguire was and how shit Garfield was. Let's be honest, we could do better than both of the attempts Sony made and his brief time in Civil War showed that maybe Holland had what it took.

Sunday, 9 July 2017

SUNDAY RUNDOWN - THAT'S WHAT SHE READ

So my week off work is over and I was back at work yesterday. It's safe to say I ached everywhere when I got home yesterday and couldn't face anything. Which, actually, also sums up my week off. Having planned to get some shit done in terms of reading, I actually didn't get much done. I carried on in my attempt to reread Harry Potter but that was the extent. Turns out, after weeks of not getting enough sleep, your body reacts to a holiday by sleeping a lot. I'm not complaining I just wish I'd done more. Still, I managed to see some friends and do some fun stuff. So I shouldn't really complain.

Thursday, 6 July 2017

TBT - Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter (2012)

When Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter came out in cinemas I was super excited to see it because, you know, Abraham Lincoln and vampire hunting. Of course, I couldn't find anyone who shared my interest in it so I never got to see it in the cinema. After all, it's not the kind of film you should really see alone. I think it would have said a bit too much about me as a person. Then, as time went by, I forgot about this film and never saw it at all. And, to be quite honest, the dismal Pride and Prejudice and zombies hadn't really convinced me that mixing fantasy with period drama was a very good idea. Normally, I love a bit of altered history but does it need vampires? Especially at a time when vampires had been ruined thanks to the god-awful Twilight films. Added to that, I've never been convinced that Dominic Cooper was a necessary addition to any cast list. No matter how many times my friend tries to convince me that he's fantastic. He just seems a bit smug and gets a lot of freedom down to his looks. He's like a male Keira Knightley... but nowhere near as good looking or posh. Still, In need of an Abraham Lincoln film to accompany Tuesday's Lincoln in the Bardo review, I decided it was time to watch it. After all, I felt like Steven Spielberg's Lincoln from the same year would be a bit heavier than I was really ready for in the middle of my week off. Maybe it would have been appropriate coming after the announcement that the actor is set to retire from acting? Of course, I hadn't thought of that until this moment... so, the crazy vampire story it is.

Wednesday, 5 July 2017

TOP 10 WEN-SDAY - RANKING MCU MOVIES

Tomorrow I'm watching Spider-Man: Homecoming and I couldn't be more excited. I've enjoyed the majority of Spider-Man films that have been released, probably only really excluding Toby Maguire's third outing, but none of them have really done fantastic things. I think Andrew Garfield was perfectly cast but the stories just didn't cut it. Toby Maguire was fine for the time and his films are still astonishing in terms of that era. However, his portrayal of Peter Parker just seems flat nowadays. With this film being the third time a new actor has taken up the spidey suit in 15 years, it's starting to feel like every young-ish actor will eventually get the chance to play him. Still, I have high hopes for Tom Holland. His brief appearance in Civil War was an absolute treat within all of the heavy shit going on and proved that a solo film could be full of geeky fun. To get myself in the mood for watching this new film I spent today watching some past Marvel films: namely Civil War and Ant-Man. Both were great, obviously, but it got me thinking about my ranking of the films in the MCU. It's something I've tried to avoid doing because it's such a changeable thing. However, with another Top 10 Wen-sday upon us, I decided it was time to give it a go. Expect this to have changed by tomorrow.

Tuesday, 4 July 2017

Tuesday's Reviews: Lincoln in the Bardo by George Saunders

When I was preparing my 'Most Anticipated Books of 2017' list, I kept seeing loads of people eagerly awaiting the release of George Saunders' first novel. I didn't add the book to my list, though, because I wasn't sure I'd be interested. I enjoy history but I don't know a great deal about the intricacies of American history. Only the bits that have been directly tied up with British history really. I mean I know the basics but I can't tell you a great deal about Abraham Lincoln apart from, you know, the Civil War and slavery thing. So a novel that delved into an untold story of his private life really didn't seem as though it was for me. Until I discovered the audiobook, anyway. I was interested as soon as I read the name Nick Offerman but it just kept getting better. I mean pretty much everyone is in this bloody audiobook. It's amazing. So I used one of my credits to buy the thing and I'm really glad I did. I've still never seen a copy of the actual book so this will review be entirely based on the audiobook. However, I'd encourage anyone to get it for sheer entertainment value. If you've read the book or not.

Monday, 3 July 2017

Quick Review: The Circle (2017)

As I said in my Sunday Rundown this week, I never finished The Circle by Dave Eggers. I bought it way back in 2014 and tried to read it a couple of years ago, I think. I never got very far with it. Yesterday I posted a picture on Instagram of Dave Egger's novel The Circle after I'd watched the film adaptation on Netflix. It created a lot of discussion, which I absolutely loved, but one of the comments suggested I finish reading the book because it "has its finger on the pulse of our zeitgeist." Maybe it's just me but isn't this the most disgusting statement you've ever heard? Finger on the pulse of our zeitgeist? It's the kind of thing some awful contestant on The Apprentice would say in their audition tape. "Oh yes, Lord Sugar, I've got my finger on the pulse of our zeitgeist." Bleurgh. It's also, if you ask me, not actually true anymore. The Circle was released in 2013 when social media was still coming into its own. Everyone was on Facebook and Twitter but we hadn't reached the pinnacle that we have now. Now anyone can "go live" whenever they want and talk about any old shit they want. That's the problem with the internet age; we're always surpassing our vision for the future before we even realise.

Sunday, 2 July 2017

SUNDAY RUNDOWN - THAT'S WHAT SHE READ

So did everyone enjoy Harry Potter Week? I'm not sure I quite lived up to the quality of my previous Harry Potter rants (i.e. my post about what a creep Snape is, which I'm sure is the most accurate thing I'll ever write) but I got a lot of things off my chest at least. Still, it was nice revisiting the series and reminding myself how much it meant to me. I think there are parts of the Harry Potter fandom that make it seem as though there is only one way to appreciate the series so I always felt like I wasn't a real fan any more. Just because I don't reread the books every few months or feel like they're the best books ever written shouldn't mean I can't consider myself a fan. I think that's a problem that is creeping into fandoms as a whole. It's far too competitive and can be quite cruel. Nobody appreciates anything in the same way and that's something to be celebrated. You can't win being a fan of something. Why try? Just because you spend more or talk about something more doesn't make you love it more. It's a ridiculous notion. Anyway, before this turns into another rant I'd better get on with the rundown.

 
BLOG DESIGN BY DESIGNER BLOGS