Thursday, 20 July 2017

TBT - Snowpiercer (2014)

I have a bit of a problem guys: I'm love a man who is completely unattainable. That man is Chris Evans. It hasn't always been this way. No no. Back in the Fantastic Four days I couldn't have cared less. Even the first Captain American film didn't do anything for me... I assume it's down to the creepy tiny Steve CGI. Yeah, I happily denied any attraction to Chris Evans for years and even presented arguments with my friend about why Robert Downey Jr. was a more attractive member of the Avengers. Then bloody Winter Solider went and got really good and suddenly Chris Evans starts to look better and better. By the time Civil War came out I was hooked. Seeing him do interviews with his Gifted co-star kind of made my ovaries explode. I don't know what's happening to me. It was because of my deep-seated interest in Chris Evans that I was so desperate to see Snowpiercer. I knew very little about it but had heard great things. Unfortunately, that proved difficult because the bloody thing wasn't released in UK cinemas. Then I managed to miss it on Netflix because I'm a bloody idiot. I became invigorated after seeing Okja earlier this week so went on a hunt to find a copy of Snowpiercer.

Tuesday, 18 July 2017

Tuesday's Reviews - Okja (2017)

Since Netflix started making original films there have been more than a few duds. The online streaming site is really good at certain things, like Marvel TV series, documentaries and original sitcoms for example. However, the majority of the original films that I've watched have been underwhelming: The Circle was just dreadful; Mascots was fun but nothing to really get excited about; The Fundamentals of Caring was sweet but unambitious; and Special Correspondents was the worst Ricky Gervais film I've ever see and that's saying something. So it was really refreshing that one of its recent releases, Bong Joon-ho's Okja, was competing for the Palme d'Or at this years Cannes festival. Refreshing for about 30 seconds obviously because, as we all know, the shit really hit the fan soon after. The argument against Okja's inclusion in the list of Palme d'Or candidates created much controversy for the judging panel who suggested that the film's release on Netflix meant it shouldn't have been allowed within the competition. When the film was opened to the press it received boos from the audience and suffered from technical issues. Still, this did nothing for the film's reputation and, in its official opening, the film got an standing ovation from the audience. Everything was looking good for Okja being a rare Netflix hit.

Monday, 17 July 2017

Quick Post: Women can be Doctors too

So I've just finished the first episode of Season 7 of Game of Thrones and I have so many thoughts buzzing through my brain. Which is why I'm not trying to get an early night ahead of my 7 am start tomorrow morning. Instead I wanted to write a quick post in response to yesterday's announcement about the new Doctor Who as there has been so much controversy. Naturally, people have a lot of feelings on the matter... but that's hardly new. Every regeneration has had some amount of hatred. Even the amazing Peter Capaldi still has his doubters as I discovered today when a female coworker proudly proclaimed that she hated him. I really had to bite my tongue at that moment. Capaldi has suffered because of terrible writing but has done wonders with the character. His version of the Doctor is one of the best we've had in years but his stories haven't served him well enough. I have nothing against Matt Smith or David Tennant but Capaldi tried to do something different with the character and I will defend him to anyone. I imagine that the people who dislike him are also the same stupid people that fail to accept that Donna was the best companion. I reckon they're all fans of David Tennant and Billie Piper and just can't move on. Speaking of moving on...

Sunday, 16 July 2017

SUNDAY RUNDOWN - THAT'S WHAT SHE READ

In all honesty, I had planned to be in bed by now but, thanks to one thing and another, I'm still typing this late into the night. Not only was A Handmaid's Tale on 30 minutes later than I expected but then I got caught up in finishing job applications. Probably the wrong time to be doing it but I'd mixed my dates up. Still, I'm here now and about to settle down for a bit of reading before I head to bed properly. Though I need to finish changing my sheets first. Today's lazy Sunday routine seems to have got a bit out of hand if I'm honest. I'm about halfway through finishing loads of things. It's been a rough couple of days at work so I really just wanted to relax today. I'll get stuff finished after work tomorrow. Sometimes procrastination can be justified... right?

Friday, 14 July 2017

FBF - Spider-Man 2 (2004)

Ever since the release of Spider-Man: Homecoming this month the internet has eagerly been taking every chance it can to rank the web-slinger's movies in order of brilliance. It's just what we do. We can't just appreciate things for their own merit. Oh, no. We have to make sure there is a definitive decision on which one you're allowed to like the most. (She says hoping nobody picks up on the hypocrisy of someone who ranks things every first Wednesday of the month.) Apparently, it's not possible to thing both the new film and the older films are all okay so we have to decide which is the best. I've seen so many lists in the last few days and things are getting crazy. After all, there aren't that many live action Spider-Man films. There are, really, only 6. Which I assume is the reason that many people are desperately including Civil War on their list so it doesn't seem so utterly pointless and pathetic. It's not a fucking Spider-Man film; stop going out of your way to put Andrew Garfield's film further down the list. So, before this goes into rant territory, the main topic of conversation that seems to exist now is whether the newest film is better than the film that previously topped the list: Toby Maguire's sequel. It is widely acknowledged that his third time to put on the suit was the biggest disaster to happen to comic book movies ever but is Spider-Man 2 actually still better than Tom Holland's first attempt? There's only one way to find out.

Thursday, 13 July 2017

TBT - Spider-Man (2002)

Before the release of Spider-Man: Homecoming came out it seemed as though everybody in the world had decided without a shadow of a doubt that this was going to be the best Spider-Man film since 2004. Suddenly, Toby Maguire was being hailed as some sort of hero because of his role as Peter Parker. I get that there were many disappointing things about The Amazing Spider-Man but the mistakes weren't down to Andrew Garfield. They were down to poor writing and Sony desperately trying to build a franchise to compete with Marvel Films. It was handled terribly but I've always been a fan of Garfield's Peter... even though he is a tad too old to play a high school student. Plus, how was everyone forgetting that Toby Maguire is kind of a terrible actor in these films? Those tears when Uncle Ben dies? That's been a pretty strong feature of the meme circuit for years now. I felt like I had fallen in an insane alternate reality where everybody else's memories of those films were different from mine. So, I decided to rewatch them for this week... just to be sure.

Wednesday, 12 July 2017

Tuesday's (ish) Reviews - Spider-Man: Homecoming (2017)

I've always felt that Andrew Garfield got a bit of a rough deal when it came to his time as Spider-Man. He is now widely considered the worst version of the character to appear on screen but it's hardly his fault. Now, I liked The Amazing Spider-Man and thought Garfield did a really good job with the character of Peter Parker. Yes, he wasn't the same geeky, isolated young man that we're used to but we're living in a world where geek is cool. Garfield gave Peter some sass and it could have worked really well for him because Spider-Man has always been the sassy one. The films didn't work because Garfield was bad but because he wasn't given the right material. Sony fucked up the reboot in order to get it out in time. I think the things would have been very different if the actor had been given more of a chance and there had been more thought in the whole thing. Plus, there's a lot of weird nostalgia surrounding Toby Magurire's time as the character that I don't really get. He's not that good. It's just that he was the first major big screen version of the character. It just boggles my mind that so much of the stuff I read before I saw Tom Holland's first solo outing as the web-slinger was focused on how great Maguire was and how shit Garfield was. Let's be honest, we could do better than both of the attempts Sony made and his brief time in Civil War showed that maybe Holland had what it took.

Sunday, 9 July 2017

SUNDAY RUNDOWN - THAT'S WHAT SHE READ

So my week off work is over and I was back at work yesterday. It's safe to say I ached everywhere when I got home yesterday and couldn't face anything. Which, actually, also sums up my week off. Having planned to get some shit done in terms of reading, I actually didn't get much done. I carried on in my attempt to reread Harry Potter but that was the extent. Turns out, after weeks of not getting enough sleep, your body reacts to a holiday by sleeping a lot. I'm not complaining I just wish I'd done more. Still, I managed to see some friends and do some fun stuff. So I shouldn't really complain.
 
BLOG DESIGN BY DESIGNER BLOGS